Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 256-269 , October 2011

Behavior of Rodents with an Emphasis on Enrichment

  • João Brandão, LMV

      Affiliations

    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: João Brandão, LMV, Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, School of Veterinary Medicine, Louisiana State University, Skip Bertman Dr, Baton Rouge, LA 70803
    • ,
  • Jörg Mayer (Dr. med. vet., MSc, Dip. ABVP (Exotic Companion Mammal))

References 

  1. Nowak RM. Walker's Mammals of the World. (ed 6). Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press; 1999;
  2. Samuels JX, Van Valkenburgh B. Skeletal indicators of locomotor adaptations in living and extinct rodents. J Morphol. 2008;269:1387–1411
  3. Morton DB. Behaviour of rabbits and rodents. In:  Jensen P editors. The Ethology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text. (ed 2). Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing; 2002;p. 193–210
  4. Richter CP. Rats, man, and the welfare state. Am Psychol. 1959;14:18–28
  5. Suckow MA, Danneman P, Brayton C. The Laboratory Mouse. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2001;
  6. Young RJ. Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing; 2003;
  7. Sheperdson DJ. The role of environmental enrichment in the captive breeding and reintroduction of endangered species. In:  Olney PJS,  Mace GM,  Feistner ATC editor. Creative Conservation: Interactive Management of Wild and Captive Animals. Virginia Beach, VA: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press; 1994;p. 167–177
  8. Reinhardt V, Reinhardt A. Environmental Enrichment for Caged Rhesus Macaques (Macaca mulatta)—Photographic Documentation and Literature Review. (ed 2). Washington, D.C: Animal Welfare Institute; 2001;
  9. Wemelsfelder F. Animal boredom—a model of chronic suffering in captive animals and its consequences for environmental enrichment. Hum Innov Alt Anim Exper. 1994;8:587–591
  10. Benaroya-Milshtein N, Hollander N, Apter A, et al. Environmental enrichment in mice decreases anxiety, attenuates stress responses and enhances natural killer cell activity. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;20:1341–1347
  11. Bell JA, Livesey PJ, Meyer JF. Environmental enrichment influences survival rate and enhances exploration and learning but produces variable responses to the radial maze in old rats. Dev Psychobiol. 2009;51:564–578
  12. Lores-Arnaiz S, Bustamante J, Arismendi M, et al. Extensive enriched environments protect old rats from the aging dependent impairment of spatial cognition, synaptic plasticity and nitric oxide production. Behav Brain Res. 2006;169:294–302
  13. Riege WH. Environmental influences on brain and behavior of year-old rats. Dev Psychobiol. 1971;4:157–167
  14. Kingston SG, Hoffman-Goetz L. Effect of environmental enrichment and housing density on immune system reactivity to acute exercise stress. Physiol Behav. 1996;60:145–150
  15. Hutchinson E, Avery A, Vandewoude S. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents. ILAR J. 2005;46:148–161
  16. Laviola G, Hannan AJ, Macrì S, et al. Effects of enriched environment on animal models of neurodegenerative diseases and psychiatric disorders. Neurobiol Dis. 2008;31:159–168
  17. Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7:697–709
  18. Nilsson M, Perfilieva E, Johansson U, et al. Enriched environment increases neurogenesis in the adult rat dentate gyrus and improves spatial memory. J Neurobiol. 1999;39:569–578
  19. Würbel H. Ideal homes? (Housing effects on rodent brain and behaviour). Trends Neurosci. 2001;24:207–211
  20. Bayne K. Potential for unintended consequences of environmental enrichment for laboratory animals and research results. ILAR J. 2005;46:129–139
  21. Hubbs AH, Millar JS, Wiebe JP. Effect of brief exposure to a potential predator on cortisol concentrations in female Columbian ground squirrels (Spermophilus columbianus). Can J Zool. 2000;78:578–587
  22. Roy V, Belzung C, Delarue C, et al. Environmental enrichment in BALB/c mice: effects in classical tests of anxiety and exposure to a predatory odor. Physiol Behav. 2001;74:313–320
  23. Van Schaik CP. Social learning and culture in animals. In:  Kappeler P editors. Animal Behaviour: Evolution and Mechanisms. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Co; 2010;p. 623–654
  24. Galef BG. Social learning. In:  Whishaw IQ,  Kolb B editor. The Behavior of the Laboratory Rat: A Handbook with Tests. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2005;p. 363–370
  25. Panksepp J, Burgdorf J. Laughing rats? (Playful tickling arouses high-frequency ultrasonic chirping in young rodents). In:  Hameroff SR,  Kaszniak AW,  Chalmers DJ editor. Toward a Science of Consciousness III: The Third Tucson Discussions and Debates. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999;p. 231–244
  26. Burgdorf J, Panksepp J. Tickling induces reward in adolescent rats. Physiol Behav. 2001;72:167–173
  27. Burn CC. What is it like to be a rat? (Rat sensory perception and its implications for experimental design and rat welfare). Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2008;112:1–32
  28. Barnard CJ, Hurst JL, Aldhous P. Of mice and kin: the functional significance of kin bias in social behaviour. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 1991;66:379–430
  29. Lofgren JL, Erdman SE, Wong C, et al. Castration eliminates conspecific aggression in group housed male surveillance mice. [abstract] Proc Am Assoc Lab An Sci (AALAS), Indianapolis, IN. 2008;46
  30. Baumans V. Environmental enrichment for laboratory rodents and rabbits: requirements of rodents, rabbits, and research. ILAR J. 2005;46:162–170
  31. Van der Weerd HA, Baumans V. Environmental enrichment in rodents. In:  Smith CP,  Taylor V editor. Environmental Enrichment Information Resources for Laboratory Animals: 1965-1995: Birds, Cats, Dogs, Farm Animals, Ferrets, Rabbits, and Rodents, AWIC Resource Series. Beltsville, MD: US Department of Agriculture; 1995;p. 145–212
  32. Patterson-Kane EG, Hunt M, Harper D. Rats demand social contact. Anim Welf. 2002;11:327–332
  33. Patterson-Kane EG, Hunt M, Harper DN. Behavioral indexes of poor welfare in laboratory rats. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 1999;2:97–110
  34. Brown PS, Down ML, Wyatt AC. Caging rats for bioassay. J Inst Anim Tech. 1968;19:78–84
  35. Syme LA, Hughes RN. Social isolation in young rats: Effects of cage size on open-field behavior. Psychonomic Sci. 1972;29:25–26
  36. Patterson-Kane EP, Hunt M, Harper D. Short communication: rat's demand for group size. J Appl Anim Welf Sci. 2004;7:267–272
  37. Gulotta EF. Meriones unguiculatus. Mam Spec. 1971;3:1–5
  38. Hayes LD. To nest communally or not to nest communally: a review of rodent communal nesting and nursing. Anim Behav. 2000;59:677–688
  39. Branchi I, D'Andrea I, Fiore M, et al. Early social enrichment shapes social behavior and nerve growth factor and brain-derived neurotrophic factor levels in the adult mouse brain. Biol Psychiatr. 2006;60:690–696
  40. Branchi I, Alleva E. Communal nesting, an early social enrichment, increases the adult anxiety-like response and shapes the role of social context in modulating the emotional behavior. Behav Brain Res. 2006;172:299–306
  41. Francis DD, Diorio J, Plotsky PM, et al. Environmental enrichment reverses the effects of maternal separation on stress reactivity. J Neurosci. 2002;22:7840–7843
  42. Palombo DJ, Nowoslawski M, Fleming AS. Motherless rats show deficits in maternal behavior towards fostered pups. Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52:142–148
  43. Morley-Fletcher S, Rea M, Maccari S, et al. Environmental enrichment during adolescence reverses the effects of prenatal stress on play behaviour and HPA axis reactivity in rats. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;18:3367–3374
  44. Weinstock M. Gender differences in the effects of prenatal stress on brain development and behaviour. Neurochem Res. 2007;32:1730–1740
  45. Uriarte N, Ferreira A, Rosa XF, et al. Effects of litter-overlapping on emotionality, stress response, and reproductive functions in male and female rats. Dev Psychobiol. 2009;51:259–267
  46. Waiblinger E, König B. Housing and husbandry conditions affect stereotypic behaviour in laboratory gerbils. ALTEX. 2007;24:67–69
  47. Hurst JL, Barnard CJ, Nevison CM, et al. Housing and welfare in laboratory rats: welfare implications of isolation and social contact among caged males. Anim Welf. 1997;6:329–347
  48. Dean SW. Environmental enrichment of laboratory animals used in regulatory toxicology studies. Lab Anim. 1999;33:309–327
  49. Connor JL, Lynds PG. Mouse aggression and the intruder-familiarity effect: evidence for multiple-factor determination c57bl. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1977;91:270–280
  50. Parmigiani S, Brain PF. Effects of residence, aggressive experience and intruder familiarity on attack shown by male mice. Behav Process. 1983;8:45–57
  51. McGregor PK, Ayling SJ. Varied cages result in more aggression in male CFLP mice. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1990;26:277–281
  52. Mayeaux DJ, Johnston RE. Discrimination of individual odours by hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) varies with the location of those odours. Anim Behav. 2002;64:269–281
  53. Mayeaux DJ, Johnston RE. Discrimination of social odors and their locations: role of lateral entorhinal area. Physiol Behav. 2004;82:653–662
  54. Yoshimura H. Behavioral characteristics of scent marking behavior in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Jikken Dobutsu. 1981;30:107–112
  55. Probst B, Lorenz M. Increased scent marking in male Mongolian gerbils by urinary polypeptides of female conspecifics. J Chem Ecol. 1987;13:851–861
  56. Clark MM, Bishop AM, vom Saal FS, et al. Responsiveness to testosterone of male gerbils from known intrauterine positions. Physiol Behav. 1993;53:1183–1187
  57. Shimozuru M, Kikusui T, Takeuchi Y, et al. Discrimination of individuals by odor in male Mongolian gerbils, Meriones unguiculatus. Zoolog Sci. 2007;24:427–433
  58. Ågren G. Persistence of male/female social relationships in the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus). Behav Proc. 1980;5:373–379
  59. Vanderschuren LJMJ, Niesink RJM, Van Ree JM. The neurobiology of social play behavior in rats. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1997;21:309–326
  60. Pellis S, Pellis V. Social play, social grooming, and the regulation of social relationships. In:  Kalueff A,  La Porte J,  Bergner CL editor. Neurobiology of Grooming Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010;p. 66–87
  61. Vanderschuren LJ, Niesink RJ, Spruijt BM, et al. Influence of environmental factors on social play behavior of juvenile rats. Physiol Behav. 1995;58:119–123
  62. Kalueff A, La Porte J, Bergner CL. Neurobiology of grooming behavior. In:  Kalueff A,  La Porte J,  Bergner CL editor. Neurobiology of Grooming Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010;p. 1–15
  63. Lammers JH, Kruk MR, Meelis W, et al. Hypothalamic substrates for brain stimulation-induced attack, teeth-chattering and social grooming in the rat. Brain Res. 1988;449:311–327
  64. Lazarov O, Robinson J, Tang YP, et al. Environmental enrichment reduces A-beta levels and amyloid deposition in transgenic mice. Cell. 2005;120:701–713
  65. Jankowsky JL, Melnikova T, Fadale DJ, et al. Environmental enrichment mitigates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease. J Neurosci. 2005;25:5217–5224
  66. Marques JM, Olsson IA. The effect of preweaning and postweaning housing on the behaviour of the laboratory mouse (Mus musculus). Lab Anim. 2007;41:92–102
  67. Guilarte TR, Toscano CD, McGlothan JL, et al. Environmental enrichment reverses cognitive and molecular deficits induced by developmental lead exposure. Ann Neurol. 2003;53:50–56
  68. Staples CA, Dorn PB, Klecka GM, et al. A review of the environmental fate, effects, and exposures of bisphenol A. Chemosphere. 1998;36:2149–2173
  69. Richter CA, Birnbaum LS, Farabollini F, et al. In vivo effects of bisphenol A in laboratory rodent studies. Reprod Toxicol. 2007;24:199–224
  70. Palanza P, Gioiosa L, vom Saal FS, et al. Effects of developmental exposure to bisphenol A on brain and behavior in mice. Environ Res. 2008;108:150–157
  71. Van Loo PLP, Mol JA, Koolhaas JM, et al. Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of group size and cage size. Physiol Behav. 2001;72:675–683
  72. Kuhnen G. The effect of cage size and enrichment on core temperature and febrile response of the golden hamster. Lab Anim. 1999;33:221–227
  73. Newberry RC. Environmental enrichment: increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1995;44:229–243
  74. Baumans V. Science-based assessment of animal welfare: laboratory animals. Rev Sci Tech. 2005;24:503–513
  75. Lynn DA, Brown GR. The ontogeny of exploratory behavior in male and female adolescent rats (Rattus norvegicus). Dev Psychobiol. 2009;51:513–520
  76. Jennings M, Batchelor GR, Brain PF, et al. Refining rodent husbandry: the mouse. Lab Anim. 1998;32:233–259
  77. Sherwin CM, Glen EF. Cage colour preferences and effects of home cage colour on anxiety in laboratory mice. Anim Behav. 2003;66:1085–1092
  78. McLennan IS, Taylor-Jeffs J. The use of sodium lamps to brightly illuminate mouse houses during their dark phases. Lab Anim. 2004;38:384–392
  79. Zigman S, Schultz J, Yulo T. Possible roles of near UV light in the cataractous process. Exp Eye Res. 1973;15:201–208
  80. Blackshaw JK, Cook GE, Harding P, et al. Aversive responses of dogs to ultrasonic, sonic and flashing light units. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1990;25:1–8
  81. Olsson IAS, Nevison CM, Patterson-Kane EG, et al. Understanding behaviour: the relevance of ethological approaches in laboratory animal science. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2003;81:245–264
  82. Hudson A. The guinea pig. In:  Ballard B,  Cheek R editor. Exotic Animal Medicine for the Veterinary Technician. Ames, IA: Iowa State University Press; 2003;p. 247–254
  83. van de Weerd HA, van den Broek FAR, Baumans V. Preference for different types of flooring in two rat strains. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1996;46:251–261
  84. Blom HJ, Van Tintelen G, Van Vorstenbosch CJ, et al. Preferences of mice and rats for types of bedding material. Lab Anim. 1996;30:234–244
  85. Kawakami K, Takeuchi T, Yamaguchi S, et al. Preference of guinea pigs for bedding materials: wood shavings versus paper cutting sheet. Exp Anim. 2003;52:11–15
  86. Beaulieu A, Reebs SG. Effects of bedding material and running wheel surface on paw wounds in male and female Syrian hamsters. Lab Anim. 2009;43:85–90
  87. Hauzenberger AR, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Steiger A. The influence of bedding depth on behaviour in golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Appl Anim Behav Sci. 2006;100:280–294
  88. Van Loo PLP, Kruitwagen CLJJ, Van Zutphen LFM, et al. Modulation of aggression in male mice: influence of cage cleaning regime and scent marks. Anim Welf. 2000;9:281–295
  89. Fiala B, Snow FM, Greenough WT. “Impoverished” rats weigh more than “enriched” rats because they eat more. Dev Psychobiol. 1977;10:537–541
  90. Sherwin CM. The use and perceived importance of three resources which provide caged laboratory mice the opportunity for extended locomotion. Appl Anim Behav Sci. 1998;55:353–367
  91. Sherwin CM. Voluntary wheel running: a review and novel interpretation. Anim Behav. 1998;56:11–27
  92. Reebs SG, St-Onge P. Running wheel choice by Syrian hamsters. Lab Anim. 2005;39:442–451
  93. Banjanin S, Mrosovsky N. Preferences of mice, Mus musculus, for different types of running wheel. Lab Anim. 2000;34:313–318
  94. Veillette M, Guitard J, Reebs SG. Cause and possible treatments of foot lesions in captive Syrian hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus). Vet Med Int. 2010;951708;Epub Jun 13, 2010
  95. Van de Weerd HA, Van Loo PL, Van Zutphen LF, et al. Nesting material as environmental enrichment has no adverse effects on behavior and physiology of laboratory mice. Physiol Behav. 1997;62:1019–1028
  96. Olsson IA, Dahlborn K. Improving housing conditions for laboratory mice: a review of “environmental enrichment.”. Lab Anim. 2002;36:243–270
  97. Manser CE, Broom DM, Overend P, et al. Operant studies to determine the strength of preference in laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Lab Anim. 1998;32:36–41
  98. Manser CE, Broom DM, Overend P, et al. Investigations into the preferences of laboratory rats for nest-boxes and nesting materials. Lab Anim. 1998;32:23–35
  99. Kimura T, Kubota M, Watanabe H. Significant improvement in survival of tabby jimpy mutant mice by providing folded-paper nest boxes. Scand J Lab Anim Sci. 2009;36:243–249
  100. Wiedenmayer C. Causation of the ontogenetic development of stereotypic digging in gerbils. Anim Behav. 1997;53:461–470
  101. Waiblinger E, König B. Refinement of gerbil housing and husbandry in the laboratory. Anim Welf. 2004;13:229–235
  102. Van den Broek FAR, Klompmaker H, Bakker R, et al. Gerbils prefer partially darkened cages. Anim Welf. 1995;4:119–123
  103. Spotorno AE, Zuleta CA, Valladares JP, et al. Chinchilla laniger. Mam Spec. 2004;758:1–9
  104. Quesenberry KE, Donnelly TM, Hillyer EV. Biology, husbandry, and clinical techniques of guinea pigs and chinchillas. In:  Quesenberry K,  Carpenter J editor. Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents: Clinical Medicine and Surgery. (ed 2). St. Louis, MO: Elsevier/Saunders; 2004;p. 232–244
  105. Johnson SR, Patterson-Kane EG, Niel L. Foraging enrichment for laboratory rats. Anim Welf. 2004;13:305–312
  106. Mench JA. Environmental enrichment and the importance of exploratory behaviour. In:  Shepherdson DJ,  Mellen JD,  Hutchins M editor. Second Nature: Environmental Enrichment for Captive Animals. Washington, D.C: Smithsonian Institution Press; 1998;p. 30–46
  107. Leach MC, Ambrose N, Morton DB. Practical rodent enrichment. Anim Tech. 1999;50:177–179
  108. Hawkins P. Working together to improve rodent well-being. Lab Anim. 1999;28:30–32
  109. Kasanen IH, Inhilä KJ, Nevalainen JI, et al. A novel dietary restriction method for group-housed rats: weight gain and clinical chemistry characterization. Lab Anim. 2009;43:138–148
  110. Galef BG, Attenborough KS, Whiskin EE. Responses of observer rats (Rattus norvegicus) to complex, diet-related signals emitted by demonstrator rats. J Comp Psychol. 1990;104:11–19
  111. Carder B, Berkowitz K. Rats' preference for earned in comparison with free food. Science. 1970;167:1273–1274
  112. Inglis IR, Forkman B, Lazarus J. Free food or earned food? (A review and fuzzy model of contrafreeloading). Anim Behav. 1997;53:1171–1191
  113. vanPraag H, Kempermann G, Gage FH. Neural consequences of environmental enrichment. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2000;1:191–198
  114. Dixon AK, Fisch HU. Animal models and ethological strategies for early drug-testing in humans. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 1998;23:345–358
  115. Keeling L, Jensen P. Behavioural disturbances, stress and welfare. In:  Jensen P editors. The Ethnology of Domestic Animals: An Introductory Text. Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing; 2002;p. 79–98
  116. Garner JP. Stereotypies and other abnormal repetitive behaviors: potential impact on validity, reliability, and replicability of scientific outcomes. ILAR J. 2005;46:106–117
  117. Garner JP. Preservation and stereotypy—Systems-level insights from clinical psychology. In:  Rushen J,  Mason G editor. Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and Applications to Welfare. (ed 2). Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing; 2006;p. 121–152
  118. Dufour BD, Garner JP. An ethological analysis of barbering behavior. In:  Kalueff A,  La Porte J,  Bergner CL editor. Neurobiology of Grooming Behavior. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2010;p. 184–225
  119. Lewis RS, Hurst JL. The assessment of bar chewing as an escape behavior in laboratory mice. Anim Welf. 2004;13:19–25
  120. Wurbel H. The motivational basis of caged rodents stereotypes. In:  Mason G,  Rushen J editor. Stereotypic Animal Behavior-Fundamentals and Application to Welfare. (ed 2). Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publishing; 2006;p. 86–120
  121. Powell SB, Newman HA, Pendergast JF, et al. A rodent model of spontaneous stereotypy: initial characterization of developmental, environmental, and neurobiological factors. Physiol Behav. 1999;66:355–363
  122. Sobie JL. Chinchillas. In:  Tynes VV editors. Behavior of Exotic Pets. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing; 2010;p. 138–147

PII: S1557-5063(11)00170-4

doi: 10.1053/j.jepm.2011.07.001

Journal of Exotic Pet Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 4 , Pages 256-269 , October 2011

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution